Hasselblad XCD XCD 38mm f/2.5-32 38mm
Hasselblad
43 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 Overall Score
Scores
Video Cinema
Street
Budget
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Hasselblad XCD XCD 38mm f/2.5-32 38mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 38 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 38 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 9 |
| Groups | 9 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 32★ | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 2.5 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
| Format | medium-format | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.35 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor | Stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 249 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.2★ | 0.215x |
Pros & Cons
Hasselblad XCD XCD 38mm f/2.5-32 38mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (71th percentile)
- Strong macro (67th percentile)
- Strong build (65th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average aperture (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average social proof (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
Pricing
Hasselblad XCD XCD 38mm f/2.5-32 38mm
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.
