Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox
71 Overall Score
vs
Sony MANTIS MS-3LS1-E 35mm

Sony MANTIS MS-3LS1-E 35mm

Sony
34 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Viltrox
75
Sony
27
Budget
Viltrox
66
Sony
37
Portrait
Viltrox
65
Sony
31
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Sony
27
Professional
Viltrox
60
Sony
23
Video Cinema
Viltrox
59
Sony
28
Macro
Viltrox
59
Sony
30
Travel
Viltrox
59
Sony
28
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Sony
22

Specifications

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mmSony MANTIS MS-3LS1-E 35mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm100 mm
Elements11
Groups9
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1622
Min Aperture1.72.0
Constant
Diaphragm Blades914
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weight0.17 kg0.79 kg
Filter Thread52 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm480 mm
Max Magnification1:9.09

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony MANTIS MS-3LS1-E 35mm

  • Strong versatility (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average build (22th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (24th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm is CA$3,653 cheaper (19.7x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.362score per dollar
vs
Sony MANTIS MS-3LS1-E 35mm0.009score per dollar

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm offers 40.2x better value for money

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Sony MANTIS MS-3LS1-E 35mm

Verdict

Winner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider