ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 32" Black 2024
ASUS
79 Overall Score
vs
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
MSI
96 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Gaming
Office
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 32" | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,500 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits | 450 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 125% sRGB, DCI-P3 90% | 98% Adobe RGB, 99% DCI-P3, 138% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100mm | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power | 130W★ | — |
| Weight | 9.40 kg | 8.10 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 32" Black 2024
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong performance (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong display (74th percentile)
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91th percentile)91th %ile
Pricing
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 32" Black 20240.153score per dollar
vs
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 20250.076score per dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 32" Black 2024 offers 2.0x better value for money
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS 32" Black 2024
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
Verdict
Winner: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"
Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 29 specs.
