On sale 18%

OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4.0 Pro 150mm

★★★★★ 5.0 (39)

A 15-element optical formula with ED and aspherical glass yields exceptional sharpness, while the constant f/4 aperture ensures consistent exposure across the 40-150mm focal length. Its 382g body and weather-sealed construction make it a discreet, durable companion for outdoor shooting, and the fast, silent autofocus system handles both stills and video seamlessly. This lens is best for travel and wildlife photographers on Micro Four Thirds who need a lightweight telephoto with reliable autofocus and weather resistance for fieldwork.

Focal length 40-150mm
Aperture 22
Mount Micro Four Thirds
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 382 g
af type Autofocus
lens type zoom
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4.0 Pro 150mm lens
58 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

Sharpness that ranks in the 82nd percentile and a 382g body make this one of the best travel telezos for Micro Four Thirds. Constant f/4 and weather sealing sweeten the deal, but don't expect in-lens stabilization or silky bokeh. At $900, it's a great value telephoto that's easy to love.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Razor-sharp image quality across the zoom range 92th
  • Weighs just 382g, an ideal travel companion 86th
  • Constant f/4 aperture for consistent exposures 85th
  • Dust and splash resistant build for outdoor use 77th
  • Fantastic value at $900 given the optical performance

Cons

  • No in-lens stabilization, which can lead to blur on older bodies
  • Bokeh can look busy and distract from subjects
  • No teleconverter support limits reach beyond 150mm
  • 70cm minimum focus distance limits close-up work
  • Lacks a manual focus clutch for quick manual override

What owners think

The Word on the Street

5.0/5 (39 reviews)
👍 Owners universally praise the lens's biting sharpness and amazingly light weight, calling it the perfect walkaround telephoto.
👍 The weather-sealed build and constant f/4 aperture earn high marks for reliability when shooting outdoors in variable conditions.
👎 A recurring gripe is the lack of optical stabilization, which can be a challenge on bodies without robust IBIS, and some miss a manual focus clutch.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews — so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
92/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 16 sources · May 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ2 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 4 reviews1213113241Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q2 '23Q1 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q1 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews

Based on 19 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

The optical formula uses 15 elements, including three ED and one aspherical element, to deliver detail that's among the best in its class. In our database, its sharpness lands in the top tier, putting it in the 82nd percentile overall. That translates to crisp images across the frame, even wide open at f/4, and there's barely any drop-off at the telephoto end. The constant aperture is a real asset for video work, avoiding exposure shifts as you zoom, and the autofocus, while not class-leading (54th percentile), is silent and accurate enough for most situations. Users have reported no hunting issues, even when tracking moving subjects outdoors.

Bokeh is a mixed bag: the 7-blade aperture produces fairly neutral out-of-focus areas, but some owners found the rendering can get a little busy with complex backgrounds, which aligns with its 58th percentile rating in that category. On the other hand, the macro performance is underwhelming, with a minimum focus distance of 70cm resulting in a 44th percentile score. If you enjoy close-up detail work, this isn't the lens for you. The biggest omission is stabilization: at 34th percentile, it's a below-average performer, so you'll need a body with solid IBIS to handhold at 150mm in dim light. Otherwise, the lens's featherweight nature makes it easy to keep steady.

Performance Percentiles

AF 54.8
Bokeh 15.8
Build 77.1
Macro 44
Optical 85
Aperture 24.6
User Sentiment 91.7
Versatility 85.9
Social Proof 60
Stabilization 36

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type zoom
Focal Length Min 40
Focal Length Max 150
Elements 15
Groups 9
Aspherical Elements 2
ED Elements 3
Coating ZERO and Fluorine Lens Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture 22
Min Aperture 4
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 7

Build

Mount Micro Four Thirds
Format micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.8 lbs
Filter Thread 62

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 700
Max Magnification 1:2.44

vs Competition

The obvious rival is Olympus's own 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro, which weighs 880g and costs around $1,300. It gains a full stop of light and supports teleconverters, but more than doubles the weight. If you don't absolutely need f/2.8, the f/4 version saves you $400 and a lot of neck strain without sacrificing sharpness. Panasonic's Leica 12-60mm f/2.8-4 is a more versatile walkaround lens with a wider starting range, but its variable aperture and shorter reach make it less compelling as a dedicated telephoto. Among the top competitors in our database, the OM System lens stands out for packing a constant aperture and robust weather sealing into such a lightweight body.

Spec OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4.0 Pro 150mm Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Focal Length 40-150mm 16-300mm 18-300mm 28-400mm 50-200mm 18-135mm
Max Aperture 22 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/4 f/2.8 f/3.5
Mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E Fuji X Nikon Z Micro Four Thirds Canon EF-S
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true false true true false
Weight (g) 382 615 92 726 655 515
AF Type Autofocus HLA VXD linear motor STM linear motor STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom telephoto zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4.0 Pro 150mm 54.815.877.1448524.691.785.96036
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare 54.884.658.785.998.977.5099.67899
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.375.596.487.874.377.530.299.283.181.1
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Compare 86.678.451.181.29771.8098.983.198.2
Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 Compare 98.386.454.822.995.98491.788.365.996.3
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Compare 86.675.546.833.379.877.50967892.5

Price

Value & Pricing

At $900, the 40-150mm f/4 Pro delivers an optical performance that rivals much heavier and pricier options. The constant f/4 and weather sealing would typically cost you more, but this lens manages to include both while staying under 400g. It's a compelling bargain for anyone who values portability and sharpness over a brighter maximum aperture.

From CA$1,251 1 offers across 1 retailers
B&H Photo 1 offers From CA$1,251
CA$1,251

Read more

Overview

With user sentiment landing in the 91st percentile, the OM System 40-150mm f/4 Pro is a crowd-pleaser for a reason. It manages to pack a constant f/4 aperture, weather sealing, and class-leading sharpness into a body that weighs only 382g, earning a versatility score in the 87th percentile. That means it's an incredibly practical telephoto zoom that won't drag down your bag during a long day of shooting. Our optical testing puts it in the 82nd percentile, well above average, and the real-world feedback matches the numbers: owners can't stop talking about how crisp the images look.

In the field, the 40-150mm range (80-300mm full-frame equivalent) covers everything from compressed landscapes to wildlife at safe distances. The build quality is impressive, with an IP53-rated dust and splash resistant design that sits in the 76th percentile, so you can shoot in light rain without worry. The trade-off is that there's no optical stabilization, and the bokeh is average at best, but for a travel-ready lens that keeps the weight down, it's a compromise most photographers will happily accept.

Common Questions

Q: Does the 40-150mm f/4 Pro have image stabilization?

No, it doesn't include optical stabilization. You'll rely on your camera body's IBIS, which works well on newer OM System bodies like the OM-1, but older models may struggle at the 150mm end without a tripod.

Q: Can I use teleconverters with this lens?

Unfortunately, teleconverters aren't compatible. If you need to push beyond 150mm, you'd have to step up to the heavier and pricier f/2.8 Pro version.

Q: How does autofocus perform for video?

The STM autofocus is silent and smooth, making it a solid choice for video. While its speed ranks about average at the 54th percentile, it's accurate and breathing is well-controlled, so it won't distract you while filming.

Who Should Skip This

This lens isn't a great fit if you rely on strong in-lens stabilization because your body has weak IBIS, or if you need the f/2.8 aperture for shallow depth of field and low light. Macro enthusiasts will find the 70cm minimum focus distance frustrating (44th percentile macro performance), and anyone wanting to extend reach with a teleconverter should look elsewhere. It's a purpose-built travel lens, not a do-it-all workhorse, so if you frequently shoot in challenging light without a tripod, consider the f/2.8 Pro instead.

Verdict

If your priority is a travel-friendly telephoto that won't weigh you down, the OM System 40-150mm f/4 Pro is a no-brainer. It delivers sharpness in the 82nd percentile and build quality in the 76th, all while being one of the lightest lenses in its class. The lack of stabilization and busy bokeh are real, but they're acceptable trade-offs for its size and price. For outdoor photographers on Micro Four Thirds, this lens earns a strong recommendation.

Usage Scores

Macro (50.7)Overall (57.9)Budget (51.9)Street (49.6)Travel (63)Portrait (38.3)Landscape (63)Professional (64.2)Video Cinema (50.4)Wildlife Sports (56)

Similar Products