Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro 17mm
The f/1.2 aperture and 17mm focal length (34mm equivalent) deliver sharp subjects with smooth bokeh, backed by a 15-element optical design using Super ED and aspherical elements. Its dustproof, splashproof, and weather-resistant metal build ensures reliability in harsh conditions, while fast, quiet autofocus captures fleeting moments. Best for Micro Four Thirds portrait photographers seeking a weather-sealed normal prime with strong low-light performance, though its 390g weight compromises travel versatility.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
This lens brings f/1.2 speed and buttery bokeh to Micro Four Thirds, scoring in the 97th and 96th percentiles respectively. Owners adore it, giving a 92/100 sentiment score, and sharpness wide open is superb. The trade-offs are weight, no OIS, and a weak macro mode, but for low-light and shallow DOF work, it's top dog in the system.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- f/1.2 aperture is hugely bright, lands in the 97th percentile for speed 99th
- Bokeh quality is top-notch, scored in the 96th percentile with creamy OOF areas 98th
- Outstanding sharpness wide open, consistently praised by owners in reviews 92th
- Weather-sealed metal build feels premium, despite its middle-of-the-road database score
- Fast, silent autofocus with a smooth manual focus ring
Cons
- Macro capability is weak, just 0.15x magnification (9th percentile)
- Heavier than the f/1.8 version, noticeable on smaller MFT bodies
- No optical stabilization, relies entirely on camera body IBIS
- Optical score overall is only average, likely due to distortion or vignetting at the edges
- Limited to Micro Four Thirds mount, no adaptability to other systems
What owners think
The Word on the Street
Como a opinião dos donos mudou ao longo do tempo
ExclusivoCom base em quando os clientes realmente escreveram suas avaliações — para ver se os elogios iniciais se mantiveram.
Com base em 11 avaliações de clientes datadas, agrupadas por trimestre civil. A análise por período está em inglês.
The proof
Performance
You're getting 15 elements in 11 groups, including a Super ED and an ED-DSA element to keep aberrations in check. Our database says the overall optical score is average, but that's misleading if you care about results at f/1.2. Wide open, centre sharpness is superb, and it only gets better stopped down. Autofocus is quiet and accurate, though it's not the fastest we've ever measured, hovering around the 54th percentile. Still, the MSC mechanism locks on quickly, and users never mention hunting as a problem. The real magic is in the rendering: bokeh is smooth with just a hint of character, and the 9-blade diaphragm keeps out-of-focus highlights nicely rounded. You'll see creamy background separation, especially with close subjects. It's not a macro lens by any stretch, maxing out at 0.15x magnification, which puts it near the bottom of our database. But for portraits, street, and event work, the low-light flexibility and bokeh quality are what win here.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 |
| Focal Length Max | 17 |
| Elements | 15 |
| Groups | 11 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/1.2 |
| Min Aperture | 1.2 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | micro-four-thirds |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 62 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Max Magnification | 0.15x |
vs Competition
This lens occupies a unique spot in the MFT lineup because nothing else gives you autofocus and weather sealing at f/1.2 in a 17mm prime. The Panasonic Leica DG 25mm f/1.4 is close but longer and slower, while the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is larger and lacks weather sealing. If you don't mind a zoom, the Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit G Series (12-60mm) gives you versatility but tops out at f/2.8-4.0, so you lose two stops of light. On other mounts, the Viltrox Air 15mm F1.7 for E-mount looks tempting at half the price, but you'd need an adapter and you'd sacrifice autofocus reliability. The real competitor might be the Olympus 17mm f/1.8, which is smaller, lighter, and cheaper, but doesn't touch the f/1.2's bokeh and light gathering. If you're already invested in MFT and want the absolute best low-light standard prime, the choice is clear.
| Spec | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro 17mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR | Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 | Sony E SELP1650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 17mm | 16-300mm | 18-300mm | 28-400mm | 50-200mm | 16-50mm |
| Max Aperture | f/1.2 | f/3.5 | f/3.5 | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Fuji X | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | false | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 390 | 615 | 92 | 726 | 655 | 116 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | HLA | VXD linear motor | STM | linear motor | Stepping motor |
| Lens Type | prime | zoom | zoom | zoom | telephoto | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro 17mm | 54.9 | 97.7 | 60.1 | 8.2 | 58.8 | 98.5 | 91.7 | 34.1 | 48.4 | 35.9 |
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare | 54.9 | 84.6 | 58.3 | 85.9 | 98.9 | 77.5 | 0 | 99.6 | 78 | 99 |
| Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare | 98.2 | 75.5 | 96.4 | 87.8 | 74.3 | 77.5 | 30.3 | 99.2 | 83.1 | 81.1 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Compare | 86.6 | 78.4 | 50.8 | 81.2 | 97 | 71.8 | 0 | 98.9 | 83.1 | 98.2 |
| Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 Compare | 98.2 | 86.4 | 54.6 | 22.8 | 95.9 | 84.1 | 91.7 | 88.3 | 65.9 | 96.3 |
| Sony E SELP1650 Compare | 86.6 | 75.5 | 93.6 | 35.1 | 64.4 | 77.5 | 63.6 | 83.5 | 74.1 | 92.5 |
Price
Value & Pricing
Price is where things get weird. Across vendors, you'll see listings from around $1256 all the way up to a baffling $235,291. Obviously, nobody should pay six figures for this lens. At the low end, it's still a premium purchase, and you're paying for that gorgeous f/1.2 and the Pro badge. Is it worth it? If low light and bokeh are your top priorities and you shoot on MFT, the price per performance is strong, especially when you see how owners rate it. Just make sure you're not overpaying; shop around and avoid any listing that looks too good (or too absurd) to be true.
Amazon.com.br 1 ofertas A partir de R$ 14.854
Read more
Overview
The Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.2 Pro lands in the top tier for aperture speed, sitting in the 97th percentile among lenses in our database. That f/1.2 opening delivers nearly two stops more light than an f/1.8, making it a serious tool for low-light shooters and anyone chasing shallow depth of field on Micro Four Thirds. At a 34mm equivalent, it's a natural all-rounder that many photographers treat as their 'normal' prime, but with a portrait-worthy bokeh quality that ranks in the 96th percentile. Users absolutely love this thing, reflected in a 92/100 sentiment score.
We'll be straight with you: the numbers don't tell a flawless story. Its overall optical score lands in the middle of the pack, and build quality, while feeling rock-solid in the hand, measures at the 60th percentile against all lenses. But those stats hide what owners already know: wide open sharpness is exceptional, and the weather-sealed metal construction inspires confidence. It's a lens that performs far better than a few spec-sheet numbers might suggest.
Common Questions
Q: Is the lens sharp wide open at f/1.2?
Yes, overwhelmingly so. Our data shows the optical score is middle-of-the-road, but that's for all metrics combined. Real-world shots and user consensus confirm centre sharpness at f/1.2 is excellent, with only slight softness at the extreme edges. Stop down to f/2 and it's tack sharp across the frame.
Q: Does it work well on smaller Olympus bodies like the E-M10 series?
It'll mount and function perfectly, but at 390g it's a chunky lens for those smaller bodies. You'll get all the AF performance and image quality, but the setup feels front-heavy. If you plan to carry it all day, consider a grip or a body with deeper ergonomics.
Q: How does the bokeh compare to the f/1.8 version?
It's a big step up. The f/1.2 has a 96th percentile bokeh rating, significantly smoother and creamier, with a more natural fall-off. The f/1.8 version is good but not in the same league for subject isolation. If background blur matters, the f/1.2 is worth the premium.
Who Should Skip This
If macro is on your radar, look elsewhere; a 9th percentile magnification score means you won't be filling the frame with tiny details. Similarly, travel photographers chasing a light kit will find the 390g weight and lack of stabilization a drag after long days. And if you're stretching your budget, the much cheaper f/1.8 version delivers genuine sharpness and build in a smaller package, leaving you money for other gear.
Verdict
The Olympus 17mm f/1.2 Pro is a specialty lens that nails what it sets out to do: be the fastest, most beautiful-rendering standard prime for Micro Four Thirds. Our database ranks its aperture and bokeh near the very top, and users back that up with near-universal praise. Yes, it's heavy, pricey, and doesn't stabilize, but if you're a MFT shooter who lives at f/1.2 for portraits, events, or astro work, this lens is basically peerless. The numbers don't lie: it's a crowd favourite and a low-light beast.