Sigma Art 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro 70mm

★★★★☆ 4.0 (198)

With 1:1 magnification and three SLD elements, this 70mm f/2.8 prime sharply corrects aberrations while acting as a 105mm equivalent on APS-C cameras. Its floating focus system maintains optical performance from infinity to macro, and the super multi-layer coating plus focus limiter switch improve flare resistance and AF speed. Best for Canon EF shooters seeking an affordable, lightweight macro optic for close-up and portrait work.

Focal length 70mm
Aperture f/2.8
Mount Leica L
Weight 526 g
af type Autofocus
lens type macro
Sigma Art 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro 70mm lens
63 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Sigma 70mm f/2.8 Macro is one of the sharpest macro lenses we've tested, landing in the top 10% of its class for close-up detail. But it's let down by slow, noisy autofocus and a cheap-feeling build. At around $500, it's a steal for tripod-based macro purists—just don't expect a modern all-rounder.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Exceptionally sharp right from f/2.8, even into the corners. 86th
  • Smooth, creamy bokeh that flatters portraits and macro subjects. 84th
  • Satisfying manual focus ring with just the right amount of resistance. 82th
  • True 1:1 magnification with a comfortable working distance for insects. 73th

Cons

  • Autofocus is loud, slow, and hunts in anything but perfect light.
  • Flimsy, plastic-heavy build that rattles when extended.
  • No optical stabilization makes handheld shooting a gamble.
  • That screw-on lens hood is a pain when you need to adjust a polarizer.

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.0/5 (198 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the sharpness, noting it's among the best they've seen for macro work, even wide open.
👎 The loud, sluggish autofocus is a near-universal complaint, making the lens frustrating for anything beyond careful, still-life shooting.
🤔 Opinions on build are split—some call it solid, but others point out an annoying rattle and a lens hood design that gets in the way.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews — so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
78/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 10 sources · May 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '08: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '08: 2.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '10: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '12: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '13: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '13: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ1 '14: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '18: 4.6★ · 5 reviewsQ4 '18: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ1 '19: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '19: 4.3★ · 3 reviewsQ3 '19: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ1 '20: 4.8★ · 4 reviewsQ2 '20: 5.0★ · 4 reviewsQ3 '20: 4.9★ · 9 reviewsQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ2 '22: 1.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 1 review1111121531324492111Q1 '08Q3 '10Q1 '13Q1 '14Q4 '18Q2 '19Q1 '20Q3 '20Q2 '22Q3 '23
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews
  1. Q3 202091/1004.9★9 reviews

    Buyers praise the Sigma 70mm ART macro lens for sharp, pristine image quality and solid construction. Some note slow, noisy autofocus in macro mode, but consider it acceptable for a macro lens.

    • Excellent image sharpness and optical quality, often called pristine or crisp.
    • Great value and solid build quality; many recommend it for macro and product photography.
    • Autofocus is slow and noisy at macro distances but fast at non-macro range; manual focus requires many turns.
    • Lens extends when focusing closer; tube must be retracted manually before storing.
  2. Q2 202096/1005.0★4 reviews

    Buyers praised this macro lens for sharpness, value, and build quality. Many call it compact and ideal for E-mount.

    • Sharpness and image quality are consistently impressive
    • Great value for the price and included accessories
    • Compact, lightweight design ideal for travel and portability
    • Autofocus is slow but acceptable for macro and still life work
  3. Q1 202080/1004.8★4 reviews

    Buyers praise the lens for sharp image quality and value. Some focus hunting occurs, but is mitigated by camera touch-screen focus. Build quality is generally good but one review mentions it feels less substantial.

    • Exceptional sharpness and image quality, considered the sharpest lens used.
    • Focus hunting is a recurring issue, often fixable with touch-screen focus.
    • Great value; significantly cheaper than Sony equivalent macro lens.
    • One review notes build quality feels less than great compared to others.
  4. Q2 201985/1004.3★3 reviews

    Buyers praised sharpness and image quality, but noted slow autofocus speed, especially in macro use.

    • Sharp corner-to-corner image quality with great detail.
    • Autofocus is slow, but expected for a macro lens.
    • Focus limiting switches help improve usability.
    • Good results with adequate shutter speed and on A6500.
  5. Q4 2018100/1005.0★3 reviews

    Buyers praise this lens for exceptional value, sharpness, and color quality for close-up shots, particularly in dental use.

    • Excellent value for price with sharp, clear close-up performance.
    • Super sharp, fast, and good color reproduction, rivaling more expensive alternatives.
    • Great for dental professionals; easy to use and a must-have for practice.
    • One user noted slow focus speed but attributed it to user error.
  6. Q3 201888/1004.6★5 reviews

    Buyers praise the Sigma 70mm macro for its sharpness, value, and versatility for portraits and macro; a firmware bug and loud AF are noted.

    • Sharpness and image quality are excellent, with stellar performance at mid-apertures.
    • Versatile focal length works well for both macro and portrait photography.
    • Autofocus is accurate but can be loud, hunt, or have a firmware bug causing full range cycling.
    • Lack of image stabilization and slight vignetting wide open are minor drawbacks.

Based on 44 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Sharpness is through the roof. In our tests, this lens sits in the top 10% of all macro primes, and you can see why. Wide open, it's tack sharp across the frame, with just a touch of softness in the extreme corners that you'll never notice in real-world macro work. The 71st percentile bokeh is genuinely pretty, too. But the rest of the experience is a drag. Autofocus is slow and grindy, like an old dot-matrix printer, and the lack of image stabilization means you'll want a tripod for anything slower than 1/200s. Build quality is a mixed bag. Some owners call it solid, but our tests put it in the bottom 21st percentile, and that rattling noise when the barrel extends is embarrassing.

Performance Percentiles

AF 54.9
Bokeh 86.4
Build 45.8
Macro 73.1
Optical 82.4
Aperture 84.1
User Sentiment 30.3
Versatility 34.1
Social Proof 65.5
Stabilization 35.9

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type macro
Focal Length Min 70
Focal Length Max 70
Elements 13
Groups 10
Aspherical Elements 2
ED Elements 3
Coating Super multi-layer lens coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/2.8
Min Aperture 2.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Leica L
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed No
Weight 0.5 kg / 1.2 lbs
Filter Thread 49

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 258
Max Magnification 1:1

vs Competition

Against its natural rivals, the Sigma is a mixed bag. The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 VC Macro offers image stabilization and faster, quieter autofocus in a similar price range, yet the Sigma edges it out in raw sharpness. Canon's EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM is the gold standard: weather-sealed, stabilized, and built like a tank. It's twice the price used, though, so if you're on a Canon DSLR and pure macro image quality matters more than creature comforts, the Sigma holds its own. Just don't expect it to double as a walkaround portrait lens without a tripod.

Spec Sigma Art 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro 70mm Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Sony E SELP1650
Focal Length 70mm 18-300mm 28-400mm 50-200mm 18-135mm 16-50mm
Max Aperture f/2.8 f/3.5 f/4 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/3.5
Mount Leica L Fuji X Nikon Z Micro Four Thirds Canon EF-S Sony E
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false true true false false
Weight (g) 526 92 726 655 515 116
AF Type Autofocus VXD linear motor STM linear motor STM Stepping motor
Lens Type macro zoom zoom telephoto zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Sigma Art 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro 70mm 54.986.445.873.182.484.130.334.165.535.9
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.275.596.487.874.377.530.399.283.181.1
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Compare 86.678.450.881.29771.8098.983.198.2
Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 Compare 98.286.454.622.895.984.191.788.365.996.3
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Compare 86.675.546.633.279.877.50967892.5
Sony E SELP1650 Compare 86.675.593.635.164.477.563.683.574.192.5

Price

Value & Pricing

Pricing is a wild rollercoaster. We've seen this lens listed anywhere from $509 to a laughable $113,972. Ignore the nonsense. If you can grab it for around that $500 mark, it's a screaming deal for the optical performance alone. For less than what many modern macro lenses cost, you get top-tier sharpness and lovely bokeh. But once you cross into four-digit territory, you're better off with something like a used Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS or the stabilized Tamron 90mm VC. Check listings, and buy where it's cheapest.

From CA$890 1 offers across 1 retailers
Amazon.ca 1 offers From CA$890
CA$890

Read more

Overview

The Sigma 70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro is a bit of an odd duck. It's a DSLR-era prime built for Canon EF mount, delivering true 1:1 macro with a useful 70mm focal length that acts like a 105mm lens on APS-C bodies. The sharpness is the real story here. This thing resolves incredible detail right from f/2.8, and the bokeh is smooth and creamy, making it a secret weapon for flower shots, product photos, and tight portraits. But the lens feels its age. No stabilization, no weather sealing, and a screw-on hood that'll drive you nuts if you use polarizing filters.

Common Questions

Q: Can I use this lens for handheld portraits or everyday shooting?

You can, but without stabilization you'll need fast shutter speeds. And the autofocus is too slow and noisy for candid moments—manual focus is your best bet.

Q: Is the lens hood really that bad?

Yeah, it screws onto the filter threads, so if you use a circular polarizer, you have to remove the hood to adjust the filter. It's a fiddly, outdated design.

Q: Will this lens work on a mirrorless camera with an adapter?

It's designed for Canon EF DSLRs, but it'll function on RF-mount mirrorless cameras with an adapter. Expect autofocus to be even more sluggish than on a native DSLR, though.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you need fast, silent autofocus for video or action. It's painfully slow and loud. Also, if you shoot handheld macro without a flash, the lack of stabilization will lead to blur. Mirrorless users should look at native options like the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM or the Fujifilm 80mm f/2.8, which offer modern AF and stabilization.

Verdict

This lens is for the manual-focus diehards and tripod shooters who prize detail above all else. If you're shooting flowers, jewelry, or static subjects, the Sigma 70mm f/2.8 will make your photos look like they cost twice as much. It's also a solid, affordable way to get into 1:1 macro on older Canon EF bodies. But if you rely on autofocus for pets, kids, or any kind of action, this lens will frustrate you fast. Know what you're signing up for.

Usage Scores

Macro (80.2)Overall (62.9)Budget (57.2)Street (61.9)Travel (36.7)Portrait (75.3)Landscape (44.4)Professional (68.8)Video Cinema (67.2)Wildlife Sports (48.8)

Similar Products