Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro 50mm
Its 1:1 maximum magnification and 7.4-inch working distance make it a dedicated tool for capturing life-size details of small subjects. The Super Multi Coating effectively suppresses flare and ghosting on digital sensors, while the included screw-in hood simplifies filter use. This lens is best for Nikon F-mount photographers needing an affordable, lightweight macro option for documenting inanimate objects like fossils or products.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
If you want a cheap macro lens that's brutally sharp where it matters, this Sigma is a steal. Just don't expect it to do anything else well, especially if you care about bokeh and autofocus.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Tack-sharp macro detail right out to 1:1 84th
- Solid metal build that feels way more expensive than it costs 69th
- Lightweight at 320g, easy to carry for field macro
- Super Multi Coating does a good job taming flare
Cons
- Bokeh is genuinely ugly, our data places it at the 3rd percentile
- Autofocus motor is loud, slow, and hunts constantly
- No weather sealing, so be careful in damp or dusty conditions
- Max aperture of f/2.8 limits subject isolation unless you're inches away
What owners think
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
日付のある顧客レビュー 12 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。
The proof
Performance
What surprised us most wasn't the macro sharpness, which is exactly as good as the 83rd percentile ranking suggests, but the bokeh. Despite what a bunch of glowing user reviews claim, our test database puts its bokeh quality in the 3rd percentile. That's dead last for any 50mm we've tested. So if you're expecting creamy backgrounds for portraits, you'll be disappointed. On the bright side, at macro distances the depth of field is so razor-thin that the harsh background rendering doesn't matter much. Autofocus is another head-scratcher. It works, but it's noisy and hunts more than a bloodhound in low light. For static subjects on a tripod, it's fine. For anything moving, it's a struggle.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 50 |
| Focal Length Max | 50 |
| Elements | 10 |
| Groups | 9 |
| Coating | Super Multi Coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | 32 |
| Min Aperture | 2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Nikon F (FX) |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weight | 0.3 kg / 0.7 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 55 |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 188 |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 |
vs Competition
The closest modern alternative for Nikon DSLR shooters is the Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8G. It's cheaper, faster, quieter, and delivers way smoother bokeh, but it can't do 1:1 macro. If you need macro magnification on a budget, this Sigma is the obvious pick. For those with a bit more cash, the Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro offers a longer working distance, optical stabilization, and much better autofocus, and it's a far more versatile lens overall.
| Spec | Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro 50mm | Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR | Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 | Viltrox 13mm F1.4 f/1.4 E STM Auto Focus Ultra Wide Angle | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 50mm | 18-300mm | 28-400mm | 50-200mm | 13mm | 18-135mm |
| Max Aperture | 32 | f/3.5 | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/1.4 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Nikon F (FX) | Fuji X | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Canon EF-S |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | true | true | false | false |
| Weight (g) | 320 | 92 | 726 | 655 | 415 | 515 |
| AF Type | - | VXD linear motor | STM | linear motor | STM | STM |
| Lens Type | macro | zoom | zoom | telephoto | Wide-Angle | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro 50mm | 54.5 | 3.8 | 69.1 | 84.3 | 49.1 | 5.5 | 30.2 | 34.2 | 63 | 36 |
| Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare | 98.3 | 74.9 | 96.6 | 87.7 | 74.6 | 76.9 | 30.2 | 99.2 | 83.1 | 81.3 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Compare | 86.9 | 77.8 | 51.6 | 81.3 | 97 | 71.2 | 0 | 98.9 | 83.1 | 98.3 |
| Panasonic LUMIX G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES50200 Compare | 98.3 | 86.1 | 55.3 | 23.1 | 95.9 | 83.7 | 91.7 | 88.3 | 65.9 | 96.4 |
| Viltrox 13mm F1.4 f/1.4 E STM Auto Focus Ultra Wide Angle Compare | 86.9 | 96.6 | 42.1 | 89.4 | 82.6 | 96.4 | 80.8 | 34.2 | 74 | 81.3 |
| Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Compare | 86.9 | 74.9 | 47.3 | 33.2 | 80.1 | 76.9 | 0 | 96 | 78 | 92.6 |
Price
Value & Pricing
Prices jump around by as much as $117 depending on where you shop, so check a few retailers before clicking buy. At the lower end of that spread, this lens is a genuine bargain for a dedicated macro shooter. But if macro isn't your main mission, that money is better spent on a faster 50mm prime that handles more situations gracefully.
Read more
Overview
Here's the one thing to know: the Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro is a razor-sharp macro specialist that's an absolute steal if you can live with its rough edges. It delivers true 1:1 magnification without tubes or adapters, and the detail it pulls out of flowers, bugs, and product shots is genuinely impressive. But step outside its macro comfort zone, and the flaws pile up fast. The autofocus is slow and sounds like a toy robot, the bokeh is surprisingly harsh, and there's zero weather sealing. It's a lens with a single superpower and a lot of kryptonite.
Common Questions
Q: Is the bokeh really that bad?
Our database puts it at the 3rd percentile, so yes. If you're after creamy backgrounds, this lens will disappoint. But at macro distances the depth of field is so shallow you won't notice as much.
Q: Will this work on my Nikon DSLR?
It's a full-frame F-mount lens, so it works on everything from the D3xxx series to the D850. Some older bodies have compatibility hiccups, so check your camera's lens list if it's a less common model.
Q: Can I use this as a walk-around portrait lens?
You could, but you'd be fighting slow autofocus and ugly bokeh the whole time. Grab a cheap 50mm f/1.8 instead and save this Sigma for macro duty.
Who Should Skip This
If you're after a versatile prime with gorgeous bokeh and snappy autofocus, this isn't it. Go get the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G instead. This Sigma is a specialist that only makes sense if macro is your main obsession.
Verdict
The Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro is a single-minded tool that excels at one thing: detailed close-ups. If that's all you need, it's a fantastic value and one of the sharpest budget macros around. But its poor bokeh, sluggish autofocus, and lack of weather sealing make it a frustrating companion for anything else. For most people, a more modern macro or a faster prime is the smarter play. But if you're building a budget macro rig for product photography or flower close-ups, this old Sigma delivers where it counts.