Sigma DG II

The f/1.2 maximum aperture and 11-blade diaphragm create smooth, cinematic bokeh with minimal aberrations, driven by a fast HLA motor for quiet, accurate autofocus. Weather-sealed construction with four aspherical and one ED element maintains sharp edge-to-edge clarity even in demanding conditions. This lens is best for portrait and wedding photographers who depend on dramatic subject isolation and strong low-light performance.

Focal length 35mm
Aperture 16
Mount L-Mount
stabilization false
weather sealed true
weight g 1089
af type HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor
lens type prime
Sigma DG II lens
52 Puntuación global
También disponible en:

Acerca de este Lens

The f/1.2 maximum aperture and 11-blade diaphragm create smooth, cinematic bokeh with minimal aberrations, driven by a fast HLA motor for quiet, accurate autofocus. Weather-sealed construction with four aspherical and one ED element maintains sharp edge-to-edge clarity even in demanding conditions. This lens is best for portrait and wedding photographers who depend on dramatic subject isolation and strong low-light performance.

  • Focal length 35mm
  • Max aperture 16
  • Mount L-Mount
  • Weather sealed
  • Weight g 1089
  • Af type HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor
  • Lens type prime

The 30-Second Version

Sharp enough to hit the 94th percentile in our lens database, the Sigma 35mm f/1.2 DG II delivers stunning detail at any aperture. However, at 755g with zero stabilization, it's a chunky companion that you'll feel after a day of shooting. With prices ranging from $1,549 to an insane $344,155, shop wisely and you'll get one of the best-resolving wide-angle primes on the market.

Overview

Sigma's latest 35mm f/1.2 Art lens posts an optical quality score that lands in the 94th percentile of our database—that's best-in-class stuff. Wide open at f/1.2, it resolves detail that most primes can't touch stopped down, and the 4 aspherical elements plus a low-dispersion element keep aberrations on a short leash. But you're paying for that sharpness with 755g of metal and glass, and our travel score of 38.3 makes it clear this isn't a casual carry lens.

Where it really sings is in low light and subject separation. The f/1.2 aperture gives you control over depth of field that f/1.4 or f/2.8 lenses simply can't match, and the 11-blade diaphragm produces smooth bokeh that owners rave about. Still, our database ranks its bokeh quality a middling 40th percentile, so while it's pleasant, the smoothest background blur comes from pricier options. Build quality feels rugged and the weather sealing gives peace of mind, but the lack of optical stabilization and that heft will put off hybrid shooters.

Performance

Sharpness is the headline act. At f/1.2, center-frame detail rivals what many lenses manage at f/5.6, and the contrast is punchy. The HLA-driven autofocus motor is quiet and snaps right into place for stills; it's not the fastest system we've ever measured (54th percentile AF, so about average), but it rarely misses in street or portrait scenarios. The 11 blade diaphragm creates rounded bokeh balls, though our tests show cat's eye shapes toward the edges and some vignetting that users also mention—correctable in post but not ideal for straight-out-of-camera work.

Aperture control is silky with the dedicated ring, and the 17 elements in 13 groups handle flare and ghosting well thanks to Sigma's water- and oil-repellent coating. Minimum focus of 28cm gives decent close-up versatility, though a 1:5.3 maximum magnification means true macro fans will want a dedicated macro lens. The biggest trade-off is that without stabilization you'll need to keep shutter speeds high or rely on a tripod in dim light, which can be a challenge given the 35mm focal length.

Performance Percentiles

AF 53.3
Bokeh 42.9
Build 33.8
Macro 70.1
Optical 93.6
Aperture 40.4
Versatility 34.3
Social Proof 46.5
Stabilization 34.2

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Optical quality in the 94th percentile—some of the sharpest results we've recorded 94th
  • Weather-sealed, all-metal build that feels bombproof 70th
  • f/1.2 aperture for extreme low-light and subject isolation
  • Smooth autofocus that's quiet enough for video (though not silent)
  • Lovely bokeh with an 11-blade diaphragm, especially for portraits

Cons

  • Heavy at 755g, which takes a toll during long shoots 34th
  • No optical stabilization, making handheld video shaky 34th
  • Vignetting at f/1.2 is noticeable and not everyone's taste 34th
  • Bokeh quality ranks only 40th percentile—good, not great
  • Aperture ranking at 38th percentile shows that wider options exist

The Word on the Street

4.5/5 (58 reviews)
👍 Owners can't stop talking about the incredible sharpness, even wide open, with many saying it's the sharpest 35mm they've ever used.
👎 The weight consistently comes up as a drag, especially for gimbal users who find it hard to balance, and a few wish for stabilization.
🤔 Autofocus gets praise for speed and accuracy, but a handful of reports mention rare detection hiccups or lens communication errors.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type prime
Focal Length Min 35
Focal Length Max 35
Elements 17
Groups 13
Aspherical Elements 4
ED Elements 1
Coating Water- & Oil-Repellent Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture 16
Min Aperture 1.2
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 11

Build

Mount L-Mount
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 1.1 kg / 2.4 lbs
Filter Thread 72

AF & Stabilization

AF Type HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 280
Max Magnification 1:5.3

Value & Pricing

The price for this L-Mount lens is a rollercoaster. We've seen it as low as $1,549, which is reasonable for this level of sharpness and a fast f/1.2 design. But there are also listings north of $344,000—an error or scalper territory that you should ignore. At the ground floor price, you're getting a professional-grade prime that competes with glass costing twice as much. If you snag it near $1,549, it's a solid investment for image quality junkies.

vs Competition

Stacked against the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM, the Sigma sacrifices zoom flexibility and stabilization for that extra two stops of light and shallow depth of field. The Sony Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* 24-70mm f/2.8 is even more versatile but can't touch the Sigma's resolving power, and the Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 gives you decent bokeh at a fraction of the price, though sharpness takes a nosedive. Nikon's Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR is a lightweight travel zoom that smokes the Sigma for versatility, but it's nowhere near the same league in image quality. The Sigma is a specialist's tool: unmatched for 35mm f/1.2 sharpness, but it demands you put up with weight and a narrow use case.

Spec Sigma DG II Canon L RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 Meike Neo Series MK-5514STM-Z Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
Focal Length 35mm 15-35mm 56mm 55mm 28-200mm 18-300mm
Max Aperture 16 f/2.8 f/1.7 f/1.4 f/4 f/3.5
Mount L-Mount Canon RF Fujifilm X Nikon Z L-Mount Fuji X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true false false true false
Weight (g) 1089 840 171 280 413 92
AF Type HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor Nano USM STM STM Autofocus VXD linear motor
Lens Type prime zoom prime prime macro zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Sigma DG II 53.342.933.870.193.640.434.346.534.2
Canon L RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM Compare 9479.943.870.190.377.376.689.696.5
Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 Compare 85.891.985.794.269.891.234.389.679.6
Meike Neo Series MK-5514STM-Z Compare 85.894.373.294.551.194.434.389.679.6
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare 53.369.873.887.591.46395.989.699.5
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.166.695.886.475.269.599.368.979.6

Common Questions

Q: How does the sharpness compare to cheaper f/1.4 primes?

Our optical testing puts this lens in the 94th percentile, which means it out-resolves almost every f/1.4 alternative we've measured, especially at the edges. You're paying for that last 10% of performance, but it's visible in large prints.

Q: Is this lens too heavy for a gimbal?

At 755g, it's definitely on the heavier side for most single-handed gimbals. Our travel score of 38.3 reflects that poor portability. If you're using a DJI Ronin or similar, factor in a counterweight and a strong arm.

Q: Does the bokeh live up to the hype?

It's smooth and rounded thanks to the 11-blade diaphragm, but in our database bokeh quality sits at the 40th percentile, so it's pleasant rather than class-leading. There's some cat's eye effect and vignetting wide open that can make backgrounds a little busier than you'd expect from a modern f/1.2.

Who Should Skip This

Travel photographers and run-and-gun videographers should steer clear. The weight and 38.3 travel score make it a pain for minimalist setups, and the lack of stabilization means handheld video will jitter. If you need a lens that lives on a gimbal or travels light, look at smaller f/1.8 or f/2 primes. And if you're tempted by a listing above $2,000, step away—the $1,549 price makes sense; the $344,155 one is a scam or a typo.

Verdict

If you chase pixel-level detail and low-light performance above all else, the Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II is a revelation. Our optical data puts it among the elite, and real-world owners confirm it's a sharpness beast even wide open. The trade-offs—weight, no stabilization, occasional vignetting—are real and will frustrate videographers and travel photographers. But for stills shooters who live at the intersection of street, portrait, and dimly lit scenes, this lens delivers images that punch far above its $1,549 price tag. Just pair it with a sturdy strap and skip the gimbal.

Usage Scores

Macro (64)Overall (52.4)Budget (47.2)Street (47.2)Travel (37.1)Portrait (51.5)Landscape (57.4)Professional (58.6)Video Cinema (51.2)Wildlife Sports (45.8)

Productos similares